In this case, Monsanto holds a patent on a strain of soybeans engineered to resist RoundUp®, another Monsanto product. Farmers may purchase these soybeans, signing a contract agreeing not to reuse the soybeans or its byproducts. Therefore, each year farmers must buy seeds from Monsanto. Bowman sought an end-run around this arrangement by purchasing seeds from a grain elevator, reasoning it likely contained the patented soybeans. He planted the seeds, sprayed with RoundUp®, and replanting the resulting offspring, thereby selecting for the patented soybeans.
WIN FOR MONSANTO: PATENT EXHAUSTION DOES NOT NECESSARILY APPLY TO SELF-REPLICATING ITEMSWritten by Jessica Hauth
This week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled – unanimously – that Monsanto’s patent for soybeans was infringed by Indiana farmer Vernon Bowman. Even though expressly called out as limited to this case and potentially not applicable to other self-replicating technology, it bodes well for the patent community.
Ms. Hauth earned her bachelor's degree in Chemistry and her master's degree in Biochemistry, Cell and Developmental Biology from Emory University, and her law degree from the University of Miami School of Law. She has published her research in the areas of developmental biology, genetics, heterochromatin assembly and maintenance, and RNAi use and characterization. She is a member of the American Chemical Society, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Dade County Bar Association, and Phi Alpha Delta. She is admitted to practice law in Florida state courts, as well as in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. As a Registered Patent Attorney, she concentrates her practice on Patent Prosecution and Intellectual Property Litigation.