In Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, the "Raging Bull" case, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the defense of laches, whereby the accused infringer alleges that the right holder sat on its rights for too long before bringing suit, cannot be used to shorten the three-year statute of limitations set forth in the Copyright Act. In the case of SCA Hygeiene Products, AK v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, the Supreme Court has recently taken up the question as it pertains to the defense of laches and the six-year statute of limitations set forth in the Patent Laws. Follow the case here for updates.
Supreme Court Takes Up Question of Laches in Patent CaseWritten by W. John Eagan
Mr. Eagan earned his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University and his law degree, with honors from the University of Miami. While at the University of Miami he served as the Inter-American Citator and an Articles and Comments Editor for the Inter-American Law Review. Mr. Eagan is admitted to practice law in the State of Florida and concentrates his practice in Intellectual Property litigation.
Latest from W. John Eagan
- Anheuser-Busch Preliminarily Enjoined from Using "No Corn Syrup" Packaging
- Patent Applications Filed Naming Artificial Intelligence as Inventor
- Ninth Circuit Laments Game of Thrones Final Season in Judicial Opinion
- Guitar Maker Gibson Loses Bid to Trademark Body Shape of "Flying V" in Europe
- Estate of Prince Attempting to Register the Color Purple as a Trademark