The Supreme Court agreed with Samsung, but declined to lay down a rule as to how damages should be caculated where an infringing design is incorporated as a component of a larger product and remanded to the Federal Circuit for determination.
Supreme Court Rules Design Patent Damages Can Be Limited to "Components" of ProductsWritten by W. John Eagan
The latest chapter in the Apple v. Samsung litigation, previously blogged about here, involves a determination by the Supreme Court of the United States that damages for design patent infringement can be calculated based on only a component of a product, rather than the entire product, if only that component is found to infringe. This is significant because Apple's $400M damages award was based on Samsung's total profit for sales of the infringing phones. However, Apple's design patent only covered certain features of Samsung's phones, and according to the language of the patent statute, as Samsung argued, it should only have to pay damages on the infringing components, not the entire product.
Mr. Eagan earned his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University and his law degree, with honors from the University of Miami. While at the University of Miami he served as the Inter-American Citator and an Articles and Comments Editor for the Inter-American Law Review. Mr. Eagan is admitted to practice law in the State of Florida and concentrates his practice in Intellectual Property litigation.
Latest from W. John Eagan
- Anheuser-Busch Preliminarily Enjoined from Using "No Corn Syrup" Packaging
- Patent Applications Filed Naming Artificial Intelligence as Inventor
- Ninth Circuit Laments Game of Thrones Final Season in Judicial Opinion
- Guitar Maker Gibson Loses Bid to Trademark Body Shape of "Flying V" in Europe
- Estate of Prince Attempting to Register the Color Purple as a Trademark