IP Blog

Latest firm news

USPTO Announces New Trademark and TTAB Fee Changes Effective January 2, 2021

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) protects consumers and provides benefits to businesses by effectively and efficiently carrying out the trademark laws of the United States. After considering the state of the U.S. economy, the operational needs of the agency, and the comments and advice received from the public during the 45-day comment period, the USPTO is setting or adjusting certain trademark fees. The changes are detailed in the USPTO’s Final Rule, effective January 2, 2021.

The changes will allow the USPTO to continue to recover the prospective aggregate costs of strategic and operational trademark and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) goals. These changes will further USPTO strategic objectives by better aligning fees with costs, protecting the integrity of the trademark register, improving the efficiency of agency processes, and ensuring financial sustainability to facilitate effective trademark operations. The changes include increases in trademark application filing fees, post-registration fees, petition fees, a NEW letter of protest fee, and TTAB fees. The main changes are shown below, see the Final Rule for more information and details.

Application and Application-Related Fees

  • TEAS Standard: $350 per class (up from $275 per class)
  • TEAS PLUS: $250 per class (up from $225 per class)
  • Processing fee for failing to meet TEAS Plus requirements: $100 per class (down from $125 per class)

Post-Registration Fees

  • Section 8 or 71 declaration filed through TEAS: $225 per class (up from $125 per class)
  • NEW FEE for deleting goods, services, and/or classes from a registration after submitting a section 8 or 71 declaration, but before the declaration is accepted: $250 per class if filed through TEAS
  • No fee if you electronically file a section 7 request to amend your registration before submitting a section 8 or 71 declaration and only delete goods, services, and/or classes in the request

Petition to the Director and Letter of Protest Fees

  • Petition to the Director filed through TEAS: $250 (up from $100)
  • Petition to revive an abandoned application filed through TEAS: $150 (up from $100)
  • NEW FEE for letter of protest: $50 per application


  • Petition to cancel filed through ESTTA: $600 per class (up from $400 per class)
  • Notice of opposition filed through ESTTA: $600 per class (up from $400 per class)
  • Initial 90-day extension requests for filing a notice of opposition, or second 60-day extension requests for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA: $200 per application (up from $100 per application)
  • Final 60-day extension request for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA: $400 per application (up from $200)
  • Ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $225 per class (up from $200 per class)
  • NEW FEE for second, and subsequent, requests for an extension of time to file an appeal brief in an ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $100 per application
  • NEW FEE for appeal briefs in an ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $200 per class
  • NEW FEE for requests for oral hearings: $500 per proceeding
  •  *The USPTO is implementing partial refunds for petitions to cancel in default judgments if the cancellation involves only a nonuse or abandonment claim, the defendant didn’t appear, and there were no filings other than the petition to cancel.

See also Summary of FY 2021 Final Trademark Fee Rule 

Recent FOIA Request Reveals More Information on USPTO Sensitive Application Warning System

According to the documents produced in response to a recent USPTO FOIA request, the Sensitive Application Warning System (SAWS) is “designed as an information gathering system to apprise various areas of the PTO of the prosecution of patent applications that include sensitive subject matter.” “Sensitive” subject matter, in this case, has rather broad scope including applications disclosing frivolous, silly, or controversial subject matter, especially subject matter generating extensive media coverage. A 1989 memo initially detailing the SAWS project was publicized in 2006, but the most recent FOIA request provides additional insight, including USPTO internal memoranda to each technology center outlining specific topics for each center as well as protocol for flagging and reviewing “sensitive” applications.

read more…

USPTO to Discuss Privilege Issues Regarding Communications between Clients and their Patent Advisors

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) is in quest to deliberate on issues concerning protections from disclosure for communications between patent applicants and their patent advisors.  More specifically, the USPTO is commencing a discussion on whether and to what extent the U.S. Courts should recognize privilege for communications between U.S. patent practitioners and their clients in foreign jurisdictions; U.S. applicants and their “non-attorney” U.S. patent agents; and between foreign patent practitioners and their clients.

read more…

A New Payment System to Launch for United States Patent & Trademark Office

The USPTO will shortly launch its new fee payment system called the Financial Manager. The Financial Manager is designed to be a seamless online fee payment management system. Accordingly, under the new system, users will be able to virtually manage, store and review payment methods. Additionally, the system will generate and download transaction reports, assign user permits, and provide notifications for administrative matters.

read more…